What does it take for a worldwide consensus? Just 75 opinions.
It’s true, 97%-of-experts agree the world is going to hell in a handcart. It’s part of the frontline toolkit used by the Big Scare Campaign. Do a google search on “97% of climate scientists agree” and...
View Article(Un)Skeptical Science uses unmeasureable fudge factors
A comment from Tel late last year was so surgically cutting, it’s worthy of it’s own post. Un-Skeptical Science was trying to explain why climate sensitivity is high. The post includes formula’s and...
View ArticleSkeptoid – like a skeptic but not quite
… Here’s a new sign of the times. Almost no one has gone from skeptic to believer on global warming. The conversion flow is nearly all one-way traffic. But on the Skeptoid site, author Craig Good is a...
View ArticleThe IPCC 1990 FAR predictions were wrong
Have the 1990 IPCC predictions been proved completely, unarguably and utterly wrong? Yes. They predicted that if our emissions stayed the same, temperatures would rise by 0.3 C per decade, and would be...
View ArticleJohn Cook of (un) SkepticalScience, admits “climate change denier” is...
I don’t think John Cook realizes how his latest article affects virtually everything else he’s written. (Repeated on the SMH too.) How accurate is a book when even the title describes a group of people...
View ArticleLewandowsky, Cook claim 78,000 skeptics could see conspiracy survey at Cooks...
The MoonLanding paper is finally here. Eight months after Lewandowsky was so sure he had a “peer reviewed” conclusion that he announced his results in The Guardian and The Telegraph , the paper has...
View ArticleDear John, you want “deniers” to help you do a fallacious survey eh?
John, Thanks for the invite to assist with the crowd sourced online survey. Unfortunately I just can’t see this working. 1. The survey is profoundly anti-science, it’s exactly the kind of thing I...
View ArticleClimate scientists move to atom-bomb number system, give up on exponentials
POSTED in the Satirical Tomes: News that could have been, but wasn’t. Climate modelers announced today that in future they would report everything in Hiroshima-atom-bomb-equivalents, or Habe. The...
View ArticleThat’s a 0.3% consensus, not 97%
We’ve already found enough flaws, but Christopher Monckton analyzes John Cook’s 97% consensus paper and sharpens the scythe. He finds: It should never have been done, it’s an unscientific method —...
View ArticleOh Wait! Bricks and mortar will create warmer nights (weren’t we supposed to...
I thought warmer nights were a fingerprint of CO2 induced warming? John Cook has claimed that at least five times on his blog: The human fingerprint in the daily cycle. It’s also known as Diurnal...
View ArticleClimateMadness mocks John Cook’s “escalator”
(Click to go to Climate Madness) Pop in on Australian Climate Madness and enjoy Simon’s parody “Escalating Hysteria”. John Cook pretends that skeptics “deny” the warming trend, and see the world as a...
View ArticleJohn Cook’s consensus data is so good his Uni will sue you if you discuss it
UPDATE: After I wrote this Brandon published the letter in full and raised some provocative questions. (See below) —————————— What bad news for The University of Queensland. Their entire legal staff...
View ArticleCook scores 97% for incompetence on a meaningless consensus
John Cook’s 97% consensus paper was never going to tell us anything about climate science, so it does seem somewhat pointless to analyze the entrails. It was always a marketing ploy. If it had been...
View ArticleJohn Cook wins award as Friend of Planet for feeding fallacies to school...
The Sydney Morning Herald lauds the Queensland Academic who won an award and busted four myths. The fake expert tosses out non-sequitur red herrings and strawmen, ignores some of the largest forces of...
View Article
